Ubicación: Global + English
Global Global Algérie Français Algeria English Angola Português Angola English Argentina Español Argentina English Australia English Austria Deutsch Austria English Azerbaijan English Azerbaijan Русский Bahrain English Bangladesh English Belgium English Belgium Français Belgium Nederlands Brazil Português Brazil English Bulgaria български Bulgaria English Cameroon English Cameroon Français Canada English Canada Français Chile Español Chile English China 中文 China 日本語 China English Colombia Español Colombia English Croatia English Czech Republic Čeština Czech Republic English Denmark English Djibouti English Ecuador Español Ecuador English Egypt English Estonia English Ethiopia English Finland Suomi Finland English France Français France English Georgia English Georgia Русский Germany Deutsch Germany English Ghana English Greece Ελληνικά Greece English Guatemala Español Guatemala English Hong Kong, China English Hong Kong, China 中文 Hungary Magyar Hungary English India English Indonesia English Iraq English Ireland English Italy Italiano Italy English Ivory Coast Français Ivory Coast English Japan 日本語 Japan English Jordan English Kazakhstan Русский Kazakhstan English Kenya English Kuwait English Kyrgyzstan Русский Kyrgyzstan English Latvia English Lithuania English Malaysia English Mauritius English Mauritius français (Maurice) Mexico Español Mexico English Moldova Română Moldova English Mongolia English Morocco English Morocco Français Mozambique Português Mozambique English Netherlands Nederlands Netherlands English New Zealand English Nigeria English Norway English Oman English Pakistan English Paraguay Español Paraguay English Peru Español Peru English Philippines English Poland Polski Poland English Portugal Português Portugal English Qatar English Republic of Korea 한국어 Republic of Korea English Romania Română Romania English Saudi Arabia English Serbia Српски Serbia English Singapore English Slovakia English Slovenia English South Africa English Spain English Spain Español Sri Lanka English Sweden English Switzerland Deutsch Switzerland Français Switzerland Italiano Switzerland English Tanzania English Thailand ไทย Thailand English Togo English Togo Français Tunisia English Tunisia Français Türkiye Türkçe Türkiye English Turkmenistan Русский Turkmenistan English Ukraine Українська Ukraine English United Arab Emirates English United Kingdom English Uruguay Español Uruguay English USA English Uzbekistan English Uzbekistan Русский Vietnam Tiếng Việt Vietnam English

Catalyst carbon burn-off regeneration evaluation is a systematic testing program that determines whether spent catalysts deactivated by coke deposition can be safely and economically restored to service through controlled oxidation. By quantifying carbon and sulfur residues, characterizing burn-off behavior and kinetics, and verifying the recovery of surface area, pore structure, and catalytic activity, refiners and petrochemical operators can optimize regeneration conditions, prevent irreversible thermal damage, and extend catalyst life cycles.

Technical Overview

Carbonaceous deposits, commonly referred to as coke, are the dominant reversible deactivation mechanism in hydroprocessing, reforming, dehydrogenation, and cracking catalysts. Regeneration by carbon burn-off removes these deposits through controlled oxidation in diluted air or oxygen-inert gas mixtures, typically within a temperature window of 400 to 650 degrees Celsius. Because coke combustion is strongly exothermic, uncontrolled burn-off can generate local hot spots that exceed the sintering thresholds of active metals such as Mo, W, Ni, Co, and Pt, or trigger unwanted support phase transformations.

A professional burn-off regeneration evaluation serves three purposes: first, to fully characterize the spent catalyst, including coke content, sulfur and nitrogen residues, and contaminant metals; second, to define safe and efficient regeneration conditions, including ignition temperature, oxygen concentration limits, and heating ramp strategy; and third, to verify the extent of recovery in physicochemical properties and catalytic performance after regeneration. Evaluation results are typically classified as fully regenerable, partially regenerable, or non-regenerable, and directly support decisions on reuse, off-site regeneration, or disposal.

  • Quantitative coke characterization prior to regeneration
  • Determination of ignition temperature, burn-off kinetics, and exotherm behavior
  • Verification of surface area, pore structure, crystallinity, and metal dispersion recovery
  • Assessment of activity and selectivity recovery relative to fresh catalyst baseline

Testing Samples

Spent Hydroprocessing Catalysts

Spent CoMo/Al2O3, NiMo/Al2O3, and NiW/Al2O3 extrudates collected from hydrotreating, hydrocracking, and ultra-low sulfur diesel units. These samples typically carry 5 to 25 weight percent carbon along with sulfur, nitrogen, and deposited contaminant metals such as vanadium, nickel, and iron, all of which influence burn-off behavior and regenerability.

Spent Reforming and Dehydrogenation Catalysts

Spent Pt-Re/Al2O3 and Pt-Sn/Al2O3 catalysts from continuous catalytic reforming and light paraffin dehydrogenation units. These noble-metal systems are highly sensitive to oxidative sintering and chloride chemistry, making precise burn-off temperature control critical to preserving metal dispersion.

Spent Cracking and Zeolitic Catalysts

FCC equilibrium catalysts, MFI-type zeolite catalysts, and other shape-selective zeolite materials in which residual coke alters unit heat balance, product selectivity, and zeolite crystallinity. Evaluation focuses on combustion characteristics and the retention of framework structure after burn-off.

Reference and Control Samples

Fresh catalyst baselines, laboratory-coked reference samples, partially regenerated intermediates, and fully regenerated product lots. Comparative testing of these samples against spent material enables accurate calculation of property recovery rates and batch-to-batch consistency.

Testing Items

A comprehensive burn-off regeneration evaluation typically encompasses the following testing items, performed on as-received spent, intermediate, and fully regenerated samples.

  • Total carbon and coke content, including residual carbon after burn-off
  • Hydrogen-to-carbon molar ratio of the deposited coke
  • Sulfur and nitrogen contents, plus sulfate retention after regeneration
  • Ignition temperature and burn-off onset temperature
  • Peak combustion temperature and complete-burn temperature window
  • Burn-off rate and kinetic parameters, including apparent activation energy and reaction order
  • Exotherm magnitude and heat release profile for runaway risk assessment
  • BET specific surface area, total pore volume, and pore size distribution before and after regeneration
  • Relative crystallinity of zeolite phases by X-ray diffraction
  • Active metal oxidation state, dispersion, and chemisorption uptake
  • Bulk chemical composition and contaminant metal accumulation
  • Crush strength, attrition resistance, and particle size distribution
  • Relative activity and selectivity recovery verified through microreactor or pilot testing

Testing Methods

Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA/DTG)

Thermogravimetric programs following ASTM E1131 practice are run under inert and oxidative atmospheres to separate moisture loss, volatile hydrocarbon release, and coke combustion steps. Derivative (DTG) curves pinpoint the precise burn-off temperature window and residual mass, providing the primary data set for designing industrial regeneration cycles.

Temperature-Programmed Oxidation (TPO)

TPO coupled with mass spectrometry or FTIR gas analysis tracks the evolution of CO2, CO, SO2, H2O, and NOx as a function of temperature. This distinguishes coke combustion from metal sulfide oxidation, identifies sulfate formation that can poison regenerated catalysts, and establishes light-off behavior under realistic oxygen partial pressures.

Elemental Analysis of Carbon, Sulfur, and Nitrogen

High-temperature combustion with infrared and UV-fluorescence detection, aligned with ASTM E1019 and ASTM D1552 practices, quantifies carbon, sulfur, and nitrogen on spent and regenerated samples. Target residual carbon levels after successful regeneration are commonly below 0.2 to 0.5 weight percent.

Texture and Structure Characterization

Nitrogen physisorption per ASTM D3663 and ISO 9277 determines BET surface area, while pore size distribution is evaluated by nitrogen desorption analysis following ASTM D4641 and the ISO 15901 series, and by mercury intrusion porosimetry per ASTM D4284. X-ray diffraction following ASTM D3906 verifies zeolite crystallinity retention after oxidative treatment.

Chemical State and Metal Dispersion Analysis

Hydrogen, oxygen, or carbon monoxide chemisorption measures active metal dispersion and accessible metal surface, while X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy resolves surface sulfate and sulfide species. ICP-OES or XRF confirms bulk metal loadings and quantifies accumulated contaminants.

Performance and Mechanical Verification

  • Microreactor and pilot-plant activity testing against fresh catalyst benchmarks establishes percent activity and selectivity recovery, while mechanical integrity is confirmed through single-pellet crush strength per ASTM D4179, radial crush strength of extrudates per ASTM D6175, attrition resistance per ASTM D4058, and particle size distribution per ASTM D4464.
  • Applications

    Burn-off regeneration evaluation is applied across the refining, petrochemical, and catalyst manufacturing industries wherever coke-deactivated catalysts represent significant value.

    • Refinery turnaround planning and regenerability screening before spent catalysts are shipped for off-site regeneration
    • Qualification and quality control of ex-situ regeneration services, including incoming spent lot inspection and outgoing regenerated product certification
    • Development and validation of in-situ regeneration procedures, including oxygen concentration profiles and temperature ramp rates
    • Reuse-versus-replacement decisions for hydroprocessing, reforming, and dehydrogenation catalyst inventories
    • FCC unit catalyst management and heat balance optimization
    • Research into coke formation chemistry, deactivation kinetics, and regeneration cycle degradation
    • Independent verification and dispute resolution support through accredited third-party laboratories

    FAQ

    What temperature window is used for carbon burn-off regeneration?

    Most industrial burn-offs begin at 350 to 450 degrees Celsius with oxygen diluted to below 2 percent in inert gas, then progressively increase oxygen concentration and temperature as coke is consumed, finishing in the range of 500 to 600 degrees Celsius. Noble metal catalysts and Mo-based hydroprocessing catalysts are kept strictly below their sintering thresholds, generally below 550 to 600 degrees Celsius.

    How completely must coke be removed?

    Successful regeneration typically achieves residual carbon below 0.2 to 0.5 weight percent. Overly aggressive burn-off to chase extremely low residuals risks metal sintering and surface area loss, so the evaluation balances carbon removal against structural preservation.

    How much activity can a regenerated catalyst recover?

    A first-time regenerated hydroprocessing catalyst commonly recovers 85 to 95 percent of fresh catalyst activity, decreasing with each subsequent cycle due to progressive metal agglomeration and pore structure degradation. Precise recovery figures come from comparative microreactor testing against a fresh baseline.

    What causes irreversible catalyst damage during burn-off?

    The principal damage mechanisms are active phase sintering from exothermic hot spots, sulfate retention and subsequent metal sulfation, pore-mouth plugging by migrated contaminant metals, steam-induced pore collapse, and thermal shock from excessive heating rates. A properly designed evaluation identifies these risks before full-scale regeneration.

    What is the difference between in-situ and ex-situ regeneration?

    In-situ regeneration burns off coke inside the reactor, avoiding catalyst handling but offering limited temperature and atmosphere control. Ex-situ regeneration in dedicated kilns provides tighter control, uniform treatment, and pre- and post-treatment testing, and is generally preferred for high-value catalysts.

    How is regenerability finally classified?

    Based on combined carbon removal, surface area and dispersion recovery, mechanical integrity, and activity restoration, lots are classified as fully regenerable, suitable for downgraded service such as lower-severity units, or non-regenerable and recommended for metal reclamation or disposal.